Abstract
The study assessed the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Councils in Enugu State. To achieve the objective, four specific purposes were answered while three null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted survey research design. The population of the study was 51 public finance managers made up of the treasurers, cashiers, and internal auditors. In view of the relatively small size, the entire population was studied. The instrument used for data collection was a 42-item structured questionnaire titled: Finance Management Practice Questionnaire (FMPQ). The instrument was face-validated by three experts in Business Education unit of the Department of Vocational Teacher Education, University of Nigeria Nsukka. To establish the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach Alpha reliability technique was used and an overall coefficient of 0.77 was obtained for the entire instrument. Data for the study were collected by the researcher with the help of three research assistants. All the 51 copies of questionnaire administered were retrieved representing 100% return rate. Data collected were analyzed using mean to answer the research questions while t-test statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Based on the data analysed, the study found that accounting staff in local governments in Enugu State adopted only 24 out of 42 identified fund management practices. There were no significant differences in the mean ratings of rural and urban accounting staff on revenue generation practices adopted by accounting staff of Local government in the state. There were no significant differences in the mean ratings of accounting staff based on their designation years of experience on fund management practices adopted. Based on the findings of the study, the study among others recommended that the state government through its local government service commission should help organize periodic workshop and conferences for accounting staff of local government in the state to update their fund management competencies and practices.
xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Recently, the federal government gives huge amount of money via budgetary allocation and subvention to local governments. Local government also gets its own internally generated revenue. Despite all these, local governments perform below expectation with respect to the provision of basic amenities including electricity, pipe borne water, hospital etc to the grassroots people it serves. Public sector, according to David (2002), sometimes referred to as the state sector, it is the part of a state that deals with production, delivery and allocation of goods and services by and for the government or its citizens whether national, regional or local/municipal. The author affirmed that public sector activities range from delivering social security, administering urban planning and organizing national defense. Adams (2005), defined public sector as all organizations, which are not privately owned, or operated but, which are operated or established by government on behalf of the public. In the opinion
of the author, public sector consists of organizations where control
lies in the hand of the public1
as opposed to private owners, and
whose objectives involve the provision of services, where profit is not a primary objective. Udeh (2008), posited that public sector engaged in providing services and in some cases, goods not by the direct wishes of the consumers but by the decision of the government bodies. So far, it is obvious that the public sector is always engaged in one activity or the other; like the provision of goods or services or both. Therefore, the activities of the public sector can not be properly performed without adequate finance.
Finance is the lifeblood of any sector. It is a key factor of production. With adequate finance, public sector can acquire other factors of production such as labour, machinery/ technology, management, land, as well as raw materials and embark on any business activity. Succinctly put, finance means the money that is available to a person, company, government, organization to spend (Chuke, 2001). To finance means to provide money to pay for something. Olaitan (2008), conceptualized finance as a basic tool for success in any development project. In his view, finance can be expressed as cash or material resources that could be exchanged for money and made available for a particular project. The author noted that finance also involves the management of available cash or material resources at the
disposal of a project or programme. Chuke (2001), declared that there are three categories of finance namely: private sector finance, public sector finance and international finance. But this study, is interested only in the public sector finance particularly the management practices in the local government council.
Public sector finance as submitted by Chuke (2001) is concerned with the financial management of operations of public authorities. The author stated that public finance involves the examination of how government revenue and expenditure policies affect the economy and the welfare of the citizenry. Ugwu (2003), explained that public finance involves those financial activities which are associated with any tier of government. These comprise taxes, customs, public debt, public expenditures and related activities. Public finance as articulated by Prof. Dalton in Adams (2005), is concerned with the income and expenditure measures of the public authorities and with the adjustment of one to the other. Public finance could therefore, be defined as the financial operations of the public sector and the implications of it. Udeh, (2008), recorded that public finance means the study of income and expenditure of federal, state and local governments and the principles underlying them. The author further noted that public
finance is also a field of inquiry about the income and expenditure of government under the following major divisions-public revenue, public expenditure, public debt and certain problems of the fiscal system as a whole, such as fiscal administration and fiscal policy.
In the opinion of Musgrave (2008), public finance is closely connected to issues of income distribution and social equity. Governments can reallocate income through transfer payments or by designing tax systems that treat high-income and low-income households differently. Public finance the author continued, explains how self-interested voters, politicians, and bureaucrats actually operate, rather than how they should operate. Joseph (2009) summarized that public finance is a study of the principles which govern the income and expenditure of the various levels of government, for the collective satisfaction of wants and of the effects of their financial policies. It is an open secret that the objective of the definition above which is to collectively satisfy wants and effects financial policies can not be achieved without a sound public finance management.
Public finance management as opined by Chuke (2001), is that management activity which is concerned with the planning, acquisition, and control of financial resources of the public sector
in order to achieve the goal(s) of the sector. It focuses on how the public sector generates revenue and how the revenue is spent for the benefit of the citizenry. Udeh (2008), upheld that public finance management deal with the administration and control of income and expenditure of public authorities, be it federal, state and local government. Public finance management as acknowledged by Buchanan and Musgrave (2008), deals with the collection of sufficient resources from the economy in an appropriate manner along with allocating and use of these resources efficiently and effectively. Resource generation, resource allocation and expenditure management (resource utilization), the authors continued, are the essential components of a public financial management system. Public finance management (PFM) basically deals with all aspects of resource mobilization and expenditure management in government. Public finance management is a government including local government council.
Infact, public finance management is an essential part of the governance process in local government. Atkinson (2009) reported that public finance management in local government includes resource mobilization, prioritization of programmes, the budgetary process, efficient management of resources and exercising
controls. In recent times, rising aspirations of people on how local government should function have placed more demands on how financial resources of the local government are managed. The emphasis of the citizenry is on value for money allocated to this tier of government, thus making public finance management in the local government increasingly vital.
Local government is grassroots government recognized by law. Maddick (1963) described local government as a sub-unit of government controlled by a local council which is authorized by the central government to pass ordinances having a local application, levy taxes or exact labour and within limit specified by the central government can vary centrally decided policy when applying it locally. The United Nations defines local government as a political sub-division of a nation (or in a federal system, a state) which is constituted by a law and has substantial control of local affairs including the power to impose taxes or to exert labour for prescribed purposes. Also the reform document of federal government of Nigeria (1976) that postulated local government as government at local level exercised by representative council, established by law to exercise specific power within define areas. From the three definitions above, it is clear that local government
is a subordinate system of government mandated to carry governance to the grassroots. Furthermore, local government has both legal and constitutional power to perform certain legislative, administrative and quasi judicial functions. To perform these mandates efficiently and effectively, the thirty six states which include Enugu State, together with federal capital territory Abuja that make-up the federal republic of Nigerian were sub-divided into 774 different local government areas.
Enugu State is made up of seventeen local government areas which in turn gave birth to three Senatorial Zone in Enugu State. Namely: Enugu East, Enugu West and Enugu North. These local government areas have workers who pilot the affairs of the local governments. Some of these local government areas were located in the urban areas of the state were they are a lot of petty trades who contribute to the internally generated revenue of the Local Government Area while some were located in the rural areas where most of its citizenry are subsistent farmers who depend mostly on the Local Government Councils for the provision of social amenities. Some of the local government received big allocation from the federal government based on their size and contribution to nation’s gross domestic product while some received less
allocation based on the same reason. Most of these local government workers are highly experienced in their jobs while some are still in-experienced due to the length time they have stayed on the job. Some of the local government workers are in the position of treasurer, cashier and internal auditors. But in spite of all these quality Local Government in Enugu North still perform below expectation particular in the area of public finance management. It is on this note that the researcher set out to assess the public finance management practices in Local Government Councils in Enugu State.
Statement of Problem
Local Government Council is the third tier of Government in Nigeria. They are also known as the grassroots government because of their closeness to the people they serve. Unlike the other tiers of government, they are familiar with the local culture, values, attitudes and aspirations of the governed.
In recent times, there have been discussions and criticisms on how Local Government Councils’ resources are being misused and mismanaged as there is little or no evidence on where or how this resources are applied for the provision of social amenities.
The people’s hope to enjoy social amenities is still a mirage despite the huge allocation accruing to the local government councils.
Enyin (2009) posited that in spite of the huge revenue allocation accruing to them from the federation account coupled with the internally generated revenue, investment in the provisions of basic social amenities are inadequate and not commensurate with the revenue. The author attributed the inadequate basic social amenities to the type of budgeting and implementation practices adopted by the local government council in managing public funds.
The researcher therefore, has this in mind and intends to assess the public finance management practice adopted by Local Government Councils in Enugu State. The research seeks to find out whether the non-provision of basic social amenities irrespective of the huge sum of allocation and subvention sent to the Local Government Councils is due to the type of revenue generation, budgeting and implementation manner of expenditure, monitoring and evaluating practices adopted by these Local Government Councils in managing public funds at their disposal. Hence if these management problems are rectified, management attitude towards the subject on how public finance is being
managed will change thereby improving the local government performance and stewardship in the management of this grassroots government.
Purpose of the Study
The major purpose of this study was to determine the public finance management practices in Local Government Councils in Enugu State. Specifically, the study sought to:
1. determine the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council for revenue generation in Enugu State,
2. determine the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Councils in Enugu State for budgeting and implementation,
3. determine the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council in Enugu State for expenditure of funds,
4. Determine the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council in Enugu State for effective monitoring and evaluating public fund usage.
Significance of the Study
The information that was generated by the study will be of immense benefit to local government service commission, local government, the general public and researchers.
The study will benefit the local government service commission because it will help them to know the area on where funds are lacking, and make proper budget allocation to the most needed area. It will further help them to know the local governments that are actually carrying out the mandate of grassroot governance and the once that are not in other to proffer a solution to those local government.
Furthermore, local government workers will benefit from the study in the area of regular payment of salaries. They will further be entitle to other incentives like housing scheme health scheme, which they suppose to get from the local government council.
Moreso, the study will benefit the general public because the revenue generated by the local government through efficient public finance management will be used to provide capital projects that will alleviate the problems of the people both in the rural and urban areas.
Finally, the findings of the study will benefit the researcher in the area of further research and being knowledgeable in the affairs
of local government. Adequate public finance management will ensure availability of funds in local government thereby propelling them to carry out the mandate of development which they are meant for.
Research Questions
The following research questions are postulated for the study according to the specific purpose of the study:
1. What are the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council in Enugu State for revenue generation?
2. What are the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council in Enugu State for budgeting and implementation?
3. What are the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council in Enugu State for expenditure of funds?
4. What are the public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Council in Enugu State for monitoring and evaluating public fund usage?
Null Hypotheses
The following null hypotheses were formulated for the study and were tested at 0.05 level of significance.
H01: Difference in location of Local Government Areas is not a source of significant difference on the management practices adopted by the accounting workers in Local Government
Council in Enugu State for revenue generation.
H02: The designation of accounting workers is not a source of significant difference on the management practices adopted by accounting workers in Local Government Council in
Enugu State on budgeting and implementation of public finance.
H03: Years of experience of accounting workers were not a source of significant difference on the management practices
adopted by the accounting workers in Local Government
Council in Enugu State on expenditure of funds.
Scope of the Study
This study was delimited to the assessment of public finance management practices adopted by Local Government Councils in Enugu State for their revenue generation, budgeting and implementation, expenditure, of funds, and monitoring and evaluating of public fund. The opinions of some workers of the local government staff were sought to determine the practices that are functional in the local government councils.
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS IN ENUGU STATE>
PROJECTOPICS.com Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project
Chat Us on WhatsApp » 07035244445
DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:
07035244445 (Country Code: +234)YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]