Abstract
Evaluation of child health care services in health facilities in Nsukka Urban is the main focus of this work. To achieve the purpose of this work, 430 mothers and 156 health care providers were used to collect quantitative data for the establishment of the baseline data. The instrument for data collection was the evaluation of child health care questionnaire comprised of two questionnaires, which helped to gain responses from mothers and health care providers respectively. The data collected was analyzed using arithmetic mean and percentages for the research questions and t-test statistics for the hypotheses. The findings of the study showed that the components of child health care services proved supportive in the improvement of children’s health status in Nsukka urban and staff were reasonably commended as competent in their effort ensure quality care for children in health facilities. The findings of the study also showed that the investigated administrative problems and strategies for improvement in child health care services were considerable and should constitute part of the established standard protect providers in their practice in order to avoid obstacles and uphold high quality care for children.
CHAPTER ONE
Background to the Study
Introduction
Child health was once part of adult medicine, but emerged in the 19th and early 20th century as a medical specialty because of the gradual awareness that the health problems of children are different from those of grown ups and that response to illness and medication depends upon the age of the child (Hetch & Shiel, 2006). Children are the promise and future of every nation and the core of development which made World Health Organization-WHO (2004) observe that investing in children’s health and development means investing in future of a nation. Children are vulnerable group whose needs and rights must be protected including the right to health and development. Paediatricts (2004) also reported that advances in prenatal intensive care have been associated with improved survival of high risk neonates, but have not resulted in decreased morbidity in children. This helped to bring about child health care services.
Child health care services according to Turmen (2006) are provisions made to improve optimal growth and development in infancy and childhood through disease prevention, good nutrition and health supervision. Hetch and Shiel (2006) defined child health care as services which focus on the well-being of children from conception and is concerned with all aspects of children’s growth and development and with the unique opportunities that each child has to achieve his or her full potential as a healthy adult. According to Onuzulike (2005), child care services are total care and services rendered to children 0 – 5 years in order to maintain their healthy living. Therefore, child health care services are efficient strategies provided by health workers in order to promote health and prevent diseases, disabilities and death in children through simple cost effective measures. Hetch and Shiel (2006) observed that a healthy child’s development actually begins from the parents, and once the baby is delivered other matters such as breastfeeding, newborn screening tests, sleeping safety, health care appointments for check ups and immunizations are considered. As services are provisions made for the public to use as much as they need in order to benefit from them, the purpose of child health care in health facilities is to promote the health of children, provide support in maintaining and improving children’s health through counseling, medical examination, treatment and immunization.
Child health is a critical issue of concern to everyone, and at the level of the family, the community, the nation and the international community. This is because successful societies safeguard their future by continually striving to improve the well being of their children. They understand that healthy, well developed educated and respected progeny ensures that past
1
achievements serve as the foundation for continuing progress (Turmen, 2006). In order to improve health outcomes of children there should be more effective organization of preventive services and more coordination between practices. Intervention to achieve an effect on children and to overcome specific barriers in the process of care delivery needs to be adopted so that preventive services could be effectively delivered.
Therefore, Changes in the organization of the delivery system that concerns children
will lead to improvement in preventive health outcomes for them (Margolis et al., 2005). International communities and individual countries are repeatedly committed to improving child health. WHO (2004) however stated that this commitment needs to be translated into stronger action if the silent tragedy of preventable death, illness, disability and impaired psychosocial development among children are to be avoided, and if children’s quality of life is to be improved.
Improving child health development relies, to a great extent, on understanding the causes of child morbidity and mortality with programmes and policies aimed at improving the health of children. Moy (1998) reported that twelve million children under five years of age in developing countries die every year before their fifth birthday and seventy per cent of these deaths are due to five common preventable and easily treated childhood diseases namely: acute respiratory infections, diarrhea, measles, malaria, and malnutrition or the combination of all five which also account for three quarter of all childhood morbidity. Schor (2004) observed that historically, the field of paediatrics has been concerned with promoting children’s health and development as with treating children’s diseases, and the trend in children’s health status showed that their physical health is better than it has ever been. This is as result of scientific progress which has led to substantial reduction in many of the acute morbidities of the early
20th century and increasing survival from acute illness and premature births.
Various interventions for the prevention and management of childhood illnesses have been established to be provided through health services. According to Moy (1998), Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) was founded by WHO in 1977, the control of Diarrhoeal Diseases Programme (CDD) was established in 1980, and in 1985 the control of Acute Respiratory Infection Programme (ARI) was added to these vertical strategies. With WHO technical support and UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund) sponsorship, these three programmes have been put in place and health workers are trained through workshops to recognize key signs of illnesses and to implement correct treatment and follow-up actions. Also, a strategy known as integrated management of childhood illnesses (IMCI) was formulated by WHO and UNICEF in 1996 as an additional and principal strategy to improve
child health, which concentrates on their overall health status by integrating all intervention for prevention, treatment and health promotion (Healthy Children Goal, 2002).
However, the potential policy option for reducing the burden of children’s diseases would be to utilize the public and private sector health resources in a coordinated fashion with options for health sector reform to achieve its goal of providing quality health care to members of the population (Thind, 2004). Evaluation of child health care services is one of the strategies that can be used to provide for this reform, to encourage improvement in the quality of care provided for children.
Trochim (2006) defined evaluation as the systematic acquisition and assessment of information to provide useful feedback about some object. Evaluation as it concerns child health care in hospitals can be defined as the assessment of the features or attributes of hospital provisions for children’s care in order to determine their influence on children’s health, and the extent to which they are meeting the objectives of child health care. The goal of evaluation is to provide useful feedback to clients, groups, administrators, staff and other relevant constituencies and to influence decision making or policy formulation. It strengthens or improves the object being evaluated by examining the delivery of the programme, the quality of its implementation, the organizational context, personnel, procedures and inputs.
Evaluation helps to emphasize the importance of evaluation participants, especially the client or users of a programme and stake holders. Agency for Health Care Research and quality
– AHRQ (2007) observed that potential audiences for quality measurement report for child health care services are the providers and the consumers. This is because providers are more familiar with their methods and problems they encounter in care delivery. Also parents are useful observers of the pattern of services provided for their children. In this case, several parental and health care providers’ perception measures, as well as several measures of the delivery of preventive care may be used to assess the quality of the health plan or programme for children in hospitals and health centres in Nsukka Urban. WHO (2004) observed that the main providers of health care and their role in child health includes the two main categories of government and public sector players. Thind (2004) added that the quality of the public facilities and quality of the private facilities were variables based on drug availability and ORS (Oral rehydration solution). This is because provisions for child health care in government hospitals may differ from provisions for child health care in private hospitals in both coverage and quality.
However, AHRQ (2007) emphasized that regular measurement of quality is an important programme management tool because it;
1. promotes the effective use of scarce resources and delivery of needed services;
2. provides information needed to manage health plans and providers;
3. provides basis for offering incentives to them;
4. allows programme managers to access the extent of their own accomplishments;
5. allows comparison of plan or programme performance with that of other plan or programmes in the state;
6. allows the tracking of trends over time; and
7. provides an objective basis for ongoing quality improvement programme.
AHRQ (2007) also noted that health care should have the following qualities:
1. effectiveness which relates to providing care process and achieving outcomes;
2. efficiency which relates to maximizing the quality of health care delivered or health benefits achieved for a given unit of health care resources used;
3. equity which relates to providing health care of equal quality for the same clinical condition to those who differ in personal characteristics;
4. patient centeredness which relates to meeting patient’s needs and preferences;
5. safety which relates to precaution for avoidance of actual or potential bodily harm, and
6. timeliness which relates to obtaining needed care while minimizing delay.
Therefore, increased attention to performance monitoring is essential for ensuring, the delivery of quality services for children’s health and development, because quality measurement provides one of the tools needed for effective quality improvement initiatives, especially in hospitals.
Hospital standard for child health care involves: the quality and safety of care; child- centered care which addresses the broader needs of children, and the hospital environment. Improvement in the training of staff, appropriate emergency cover and organization of services are also emphasized (Commission, for Health Care Audit and Inspection, 2007). Specifically, hospital standard states that the care of children in hospitals should be provided in building that are accessible, safe, suitable, and child-and-family-friendly with separate facilities for the treatment of children wherever possible. In out-patient departments there should be partitioned waiting areas for children, or appointments organized so that all children are seen at the start of a clinic. Also, children receiving in-patient care should be treated in child-only ward separate from adults. This will enable children to benefit more appropriately from cares put in place for
them.
However, it is not surprising that preventive care services for children as they are being provided currently may not be meeting the needs of children and many families with children.
Schor (2004) observed that the quality of child health care services varies greatly among physician practices and parents are signaling their dissatisfaction by failing to obtain approximately one half of recommended preventive care services. It is not possible in the time available, to provide even the few preventive services most highly recommended, nor is it possible to respond effectively to the myriad recommendations for the content of well-child care (Yarnall, Pollak, Ostbye, Krause & Michener, 2003) and the current care system cannot do the work except if there is change in the system of care (Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001). Commission for Health Care Audit and Inspection (2007) found that hospitals have made poor progress in meeting the broader needs of children which reflects more widely across different services in hospitals. Insufficient number of staff is trained in the management of pain in children, and to deliver resuscitation and initiate treatment in serious emergencies, especially at night.
Radolph, Fried, Loeding, Margolis and Lannon (2005) discovered that few hospital practices have evidence of comprehensive system of prevention and some organizational characteristics were at level that might impede delivery of high quality care for children. Furthermore, under immunization and inadequate screening were observed as significant problems in private paediatric practices and some physicians are not always aware of the rates of under immunization in their hospitals. Many experts in the field of preventive care for children know that the current system of preventive care for children may not be very scientific and they also know that only a few of the recommendations for the contents and processes of well-child care are supported by evidence of effectiveness. The current quality of preventive care for children is quite variable and the need of many children and parents are not being met because the existing guidance and approaches to well-child care are inadequate to the task and stand as barriers to effective and efficient care as is the case below.
The Kennedy report into events surrounding the deaths of children who underwent heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary found that the quality of care was less than it should have been, services were fragmented, the rights and vulnerability of children were overlooked, and open and honest relationship with children and parents were lacking (Commission for Health Care Audit and Inspection, 2007). According to their observations service providers treated children as if they were mini-adults who need smaller beds and smaller portion of food. Staff were skilled in treating adults but had no specific training in treating children and facilities were designed with little acknowledgement of the needs of children. These should be considered in response to the rights and vulnerability of children.
McGlynn and Halfon (1998) stated that child care quality has not received the kind of attention that has been given to adult health care, and children’s issues have not been
emphasized in many national quality measurement and improvement efforts. Health care quality in some hospitals is focused on early detection and management of diseases in adults rather than on the promotion of healthy development and prevention of illness and injury in children. The broader needs of children were not being recognized or given priority in many hospitals. Therefore, Safeguarding children remains a major area of risk and many children are having worse experience of hospital than they should because of lack of training in communication, and staff who specialize in child care. Level of training in child protection were often not up to standard and there were particular problems relating to the level of intermediate training in emergency care with significant and unexplained variation in the delivery of child health care across hospitals. WHO (2005) observed that radiology, and laboratory services are minimal or non-existent in first level facilities in low income countries, and drugs and equipment are often scarce. These factors leave doctors with few opportunities to practise complicated clinical procedures. Practitioners often rely on signs and symptoms to determine the course of treatment that makes the best use of available resources.
A list of barriers to providing the preventive and curative services that are recommended for children which urgently need to be addressed as provided by Schor (2004), includes: time constraint; too much work-load; low level of reimbursement for preventive child care; lack of training in child development; lack of trained-non-physician staff members; limited access to community services to support families and children, and few external incentives. These barriers may be factors that lead to poor performance and may be the reasons why the needs of children for preventive care are not fully met. Therefore, consideration has broad implications for the organization, and provision of child health care and there is need for clinicians to improve the efficiency of their practices.
This suggests a growing need for research that examines the impact of organizational characteristics on the quality of care for children especially as it concerns health facilities in Nsukka Urban. Evaluation of child health care services in health facilities is considered an effective quality measurement initiative for care provided for children because it will help to access whether hospitals were meeting or making progress towards key requirements of hospital standard with regard to the objectives of child health care. Bethal, Reuland, Halfon, and Schor (2004) also suggested effective evaluation research as a means that will help to improve effective child health interventions. Lucas and Gilles (2003) observed that the objectives of child health care services are to promote and protect the health of children in order to prevent diseases and ensure that they achieve optimal growth and development physically and mentally. Child heath care also aims at the early treatment of childhood diseases to avoid dangerous complications. As there may be need for major revision of well-child care
taking into account the objectives of child health care and the varying needs of children, prompting a re-examination of child health care will help in reducing medical errors and improving quality relying on evidence-based medical approaches.
Health care for children needs to be rationalized and the rationale must be apparent in the documents guiding the provision of child health care. Hospital directorates must accept that they have to meet the hospital standard, and improving the provision of services for children must be integral to the plans. All services accessed by children need to be scrutinized and staff influenced to ensure the management of the performance of all relevant services, with respect to quality of care provided for children. With consideration of the child health care objectives, hospitals can be held responsible to account for improvement in managing performance and planning in child health care (Schor, 2004). This translates to the need for health care providers to be adequately informed of their responsibilities towards child health care and development.
Margolis et al. (2004) observed that better office system can improve the delivery of preventive care for children. They defined office system as an organized series of interrelated activities carried out by several members of staff to achieve a specific purpose. The focus of office system for preventive care is on interactions of patients, staff, and clinicians to ensure that each step of preventive care is carried out for every eligible patient at every encounter. This involves practices that receive continuous medical education and process. The elements of governance are extremely important because they are the first steps to ensuring that the requirements of hospital standard are met. The review of the Commission for Health Care Audit and Inspection (2007) found that the needs of children were better met when they were, cared for in services managed by paediatric directorates. However, leaders in other directorates such as general practitioners need to ensure that improving the care of children is integral to their plans. Improvement in methods used for implementing office systems of health care interventions would ensure higher rate of core preventive services, than practices that do not undergo improvement. The provision of tools and materials allow practices to concentrate on improving care, and emphasis on measurement encourages practitioners to learn from their data (Margolis et al., 2004).
Circle of research action and evaluation has provided remarkable achievements in
global health as it concerns decline in child mortality, but there are many infants and children who have not benefited from the progress in research for whom the fruits of research remain inaccessible. Therefore research is essential to ensure that effective interventions for children’s health are made available to those in need of them in order to improve the survival, health and development of infants and children especially as it concerns health facilities in Nsukka urban. From the foregoing, this study will attempt to determine the extent in which public and private
health facilities are striving to improve child health care and the effectiveness of their services and care towards the achievement of the objectives of child health care services. It is believed that adequate provision of quality child health care in hospitals is imperative, because it would greatly help to improve the quality of children’s health.
Although, it is the responsibility of parents and guardians to take children to hospitals for essential health services which will be beneficial to their health, health care providers also play major role of keeping appointments for immunizations, check-ups, and ensuring readiness for preventive, curative and emergency care. Therefore, parents and hospital staff were involved in this study.
Statement of the Problem
In developed countries, the under-five mortality rate has been reduced below 10 per
1000 live births, but many developing countries still record rates that are over 100 per 1000 (Lucas & Gilles, 2003). Campbell, Sow, Levine and Kottloff (2004) also observed that the burden of mortality from infectious diseases weighed most heavily on children living in the developing world where seventy per cent of all childhood deaths are attributed to the five diseases of clinical syndromes: acute respiratory infection (ARI), diarrhea, measles, malaria and malnutrition. This fact is most disturbing given the existence, in many instances, of effective methods of prevention and intervention.
According to Turmen (2006), mortality rates among newborn infants remain stubbornly high in many countries because mothers lack care during pregnancy and child birth and babies do not receive essential newborn care. The aftermath of survival in weakened children who do not receive necessary care is worse because, they may be stunted or live in blindness. Such children may drag out painful lives crippled by polio or be mentally retarded because of poorly managed delivery in health care systems which often fail to meet the needs of the most vulnerable group (children and child bearing mothers) in the society (Belsey, 1984). All children and pregnant women have a right to comprehensive health care that is fully portable and ensures continuous coverage.
Therefore, much remains to be done in reducing the avoidable mortality and morbidity rates by making the services reach all children. The importance of children receiving well-child and other primary care services in their early years is well established. Even for healthy children obtaining routine preventive care during the first year of life can be critical to development. For those who experience acute or chronic conditions, or who have special health needs, obtaining regular medical attention is even more important (Delone, 2006). Consequently, initiative to improve child health can have an enormous impact in reducing the
global burden of disease. Postnatal care requires further assessment as to the quality of services and their outcome.
In children’s preventive care for which the healthy development and avoidance of injury and illness are the desired outcomes and for which guidelines are more consensus based than evidence based, special challenges in both accurately and efficiently measuring health care performance exists (Bethel, Reuland, Halfon & Schor, 2004). Bethel et al. (2004) also observed that health care performance assessment effort at the national, state, health system, and medical practice levels all face real constraints in the amount of information about performance that can be collected, included or reasonably absorbed in performance report to or about health systems or providers. Care for children is largely composed of routine services to promote their healthy development, prevent injuries, and screen for illness and other threat to
health.
Therefore, health system in general are being required to be assessed for improvement in the quality of care that they provide for children in order to make performance information available to their patients and stakeholders of health services. Since the goal of evaluations is to provide useful feedback to relevant constituencies such as client groups, administrators and staff, feedback is perceived as useful if it aids in decision-making or policy formulation. The CIPP evaluation model of evaluation which was adopted in this study is among the management oriented systems model where the C stands for context the I for input, the first P for process and the second P for product. This modal emphasized comprehensiveness in evaluation, playing evaluation within a larger framework of organizational activities (Stufflebeam, 2000). It is focused on programme evaluation aimed at affecting long-term, sustainable improvements with questions such as, what needs to be done? How should it be done? and Did it succeed? In this case the concept of evaluation is to assess and report merits, worth and significance and present lessons learned to encourage improvement in child health care services in health facilities. The evaluation of child health care services in health facilities in Nsukka urban in necessary because designing and conducting effective evaluation research will contribute to maximizing effective child health interventions.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate child health care services in health facilities in
Nuskka urban of Enugu State. Specifically, the objectives of the study are to:
1. determine the efficiency of components of immunization services provided in public and private health facilities in Nsukka urban;
2. determine the reliability of the growth monitoring and screening services carried out in public and private health facilities.
3. assess the effectiveness of the curative health services provided in these health facilities for children;
4. assess the reliability of the emergency health services provided in these health facilities for children;
5. determine the usefulness of the nutritional services provided in these health facilities for children;
6. assess the consistency of the health education components provided in these health facilities for children;
7. determine the competency of staff who are responsible for the provision of child health care in these health facilities;
8. determine administrative problems that affect child health care services in public and private health facilities.
9. determine administrative strategies used for improving child health care services in public and private health facilities.
Research Questions
The following research questions have been formulated to guide the study:
1. How efficient are the immunization services provided in public and private health facilities in Nsukka urban?
2. How reliable are the growth monitoring services and screening tests provided in these health facilities for children?
3. How effective are the curative health care services available for children in these health facilities?
4. How reliable are the emergency care services available for children in these health facilities?
5. How useful are the nutritional services provided in these health facilities for children?
6. How consistent are the health education services provided in the health facilities for children?
7. How competent is the staff that provides child health care services in these health facilities?
8. What administrative problems affect provisions for child health care services in these health facilities?
9. What administrative strategies are used for improving child health care in these health facilities?
Hypotheses
To provide direction to the study each of the following three hypotheses are formulated to be tested at .05 level of significance.
1. There is no statistically significant difference between private and public health facilities in relation to the quality of services provided for children.
2. There is no statistically significant difference between public and private health facilities in relation to the competency of staff that provide care for children.
3. There is no statistically significant difference between public and private health facilities in the administrative problems encountered in the provision of child health care services.
Significance of the Study
Health workers and parents will find the information on evaluation of child health care services useful to check whether their local hospitals provide a safe child friendly services and to press for improvement in line with the recommendations that was made for the benefit of children. The information will also help administrators of health facilities reorganize the services provided for children in their hospitals in realizing their responsibilities in health care provision for children and in managing performance and planning in child health care
This study generated information on efficiency of immunization services which will help health workers and parents to know if government and private health facilities ensure quality and coverage of this service. This will help to ensure improvement in immunization services which form an important aspect of children’s preventive medicine against diseases that cause disabilities and death in children.
The information that was be obtained on the reliability of growth monitoring (e.g., height and weight measurement) and screening tests will help health care providers to ascertain if these services are ignored in their hospitals or health centers. With the information that is be provided, the knowledge of parents and health care givers on growth monitoring and screening tests as important indicators for children’s health and development can be improved. Observations and screening tests can provide the bases for teaching parents the need for improvement in the nutritional status of their children.
By providing information on the effectiveness of curative services in public and private health facilities the attention of health care providers will be drawn in integrated management
of childhood illness (ARI), with combination of therapies for several conditions. Data collected will help health care providers in planning and improvement on multiple approaches to help children who often present in hospitals with multiple symptoms. Parents and health workers will use the information on curative services to check whether hospitals provide safe child friendly care by meeting the broader needs of children (e.g., play to reduce fear), that helps to ensure effectiveness in child health care provisions.
The findings on the reliability of emergency services in health facilities will hopefully encourage health care providers in the establishment and sustenance of strategies to help prioritize sick children. This will help to reduce morbidity mortality and permanent disability in children and ensure that parents are confident in the ability of staff to place special consideration for children in health facilities.
The information on the usefulness of the nutritional services in these hospitals will help to provide bases for the education of parents to place emphasis on the nutritional needs of their children and for health workers to ensure quality of child health care by making necessary provisions (e.g., Vitamin A and micronutrient supplementation). With the confirmation of parents, health workers will use the information to note if they have considerations for this important aspect in child health care.
Information generated on the consistency of health education services provided in these health facilities for children will provide bases for health workers to appreciate and improve on this important aspect in services for children. The information will help to ensure that health education is integrated with other services to enhance improvement in child health care quality. Parents will also benefit from improvement in health education that will help to enhance their children’s  health  status  through  knowledge  consequently,  provided  for  them  on  disease prevention and simple remedies for common diseases (e.g., oral rehydration therapy, accident prevention and sleeping positioning).
By providing information on the competency of staff who provide care for children in these hospitals, this study will hopefully help health care providers to be clear about the minimum requirement in the care of children. They will use the information to understand and appreciate what is required for professionals to improve and maintain their competence in working with children. The information can also provide bases for in service training of auxiliary hospital staff members to improve their performance in the care of children.
In this study, data was generated on problems that affect child health care services in government and private health facilities. By addressing all areas of weakness identified, health care providers can be helped to press for improvement of services for children in line with the recommendations in this project report. The information can help hospital trusts in the
development of plans based on the areas of weakness identified by this report and to ensure that these plans are achieved through incentives for improvement in child health care.
The study hopes to generate data on strategies for improving child health care in government and private health facilities through which guidelines can be provided to facilitate improvement in services for children’s welfare. The information will help to encourage providers to continually improve their services and the way they work and to improve the coordination of child health care services which will lead to changes in the process of preventive services delivery in practice. They will use the information in decision making and in carrying out their responsibilities in multiple practice organization for children.
Scope of the Study
The study was delimited to health facilities in Nsukka Urban. Therefore, hospitals and health centres in Nsukka urban was used for this study with special consideration for public and private sectors as providers of health care services for children (WHO, 2004). The study was guided by the programme area of child health care services prescribed by WHO (2004) for children. These services include: immunization services, growth monitoring and screening tests, nutritional services, health education, emergency and curative services as well as the functions of health facilities and personnel. All the health personnel in these health facilities that are involved in the provision of child health care services were used as respondents for the study. This is because they are more knowledgeable in the pattern of health services they provide. Parents (especially mothers) as useful observers of health care services provided for their children were also involved.
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
EVALUATION OF CHILD HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN HEALTH FACILITIES IN NSUKKA URBAN OF ENUGU STATE>
PROJECTOPICS.com Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project
Chat Us on WhatsApp » 07035244445
DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:
07035244445 (Country Code: +234)YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]