ABSTRACT
Seventy five African catfish made up of 25 fingerlings, 25 juveniles and 25 adults, sourced from Yuep Farms, Umuahia, Abia State of Nigeria, were used for the study. The fish were weighed, and the standard and total body lengths were measured. The fingerlings and juveniles were euthanized with chloroform, while the adults were humanely immobilized by stunning. The digestive tracts were dissected out and the intestinal lengths were measured. The relative intestinal lengths were also determined. Slices of oropharyngeal wall, tongue, oesophagus, stomach, intestine, rectum and anus were excised and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, for
16-24 hours. They were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Adult pharyngeal pad was sliced into small pieces, decalcified and similarly processed. The carbohydrate histochemistry was carried out using periodic acid Schiff (PAS), alcian blue (AB) at pH 2.5, and a combination of AB and PAS procedures. Sections were examined with a light microscope and photographed with a Moticam camera fixed to the microscope. Data were analysed statistically using analysis of variance. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to separate variant means, and significance was accepted at p< 0.05.
Grossly, the oral surfaces of the palatine and mandibular rostral ends of the fish contained roughened grinding plates, with a degree of roughness that increased with age. The tongue was attached to the floor of the oro-pharyngeal cavity. Pharyngeal pads were absent in the fingerlings, rudimentary in the juveniles and well developed in the adults. The oesophagus connected the oropharyngeal cavity to the stomach. The stomach was J-shaped with a prominent constriction separating it from the intestine. The proximal intestinal wall was thick and continuous with coiled middle and distal parts of the intestine in all groups. The relative intestinal length of the juveniles (1.28 ± 0.06) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of the fingerlings (0.87 ±0.07) and adults (0.78 ± 0.04). Histologically, the tunica mucosa of oro-pharynx, tongue, pharyngeal pad and oesophagus were lined by stratified mucous epithelium in all age groups. Taste buds were observed in the adult oro-pharyngeal mucosa. The adult pharyngeal pad contained teeth, mucous cells and taste buds in the stratified epithelium. The adult and juvenile oro-pharyngeal and oesophageal epithelium contained eosinophilic club cells. Lamina propria of the oro-pharynx contained dense collagen connective tissue in the adult. Muscularis mucosa was absent in all groups. The oesophageal tunica muscularis was composed of skeletal muscle fibres arranged in an inner longitudinal and outer circular layers in juveniles. In the adult oesophagus, the circularly oriented muscle fibres predominated and were interspersed with bundles of longitudinal muscle fibres. An intermediate region between the adult oesophagus and stomach (oesogaster) was characterized by presence of stratified mucous epithelium and gastric gland within the lamina propria. The entire stomach surface was covered by simple columnar mucous epithelium at the base of which were intraepithelial leukocytes. In all age groups, the cardiac and fundic regions of the stomach contained glands in the lamina propria while the pyloric region lacked these glands. The pyloric sphincter was comprised of thickened circular smooth
muscle coat in all age groups. The proximal intestine in all ages presented complex labyrinthine mucosal folds, the luminal parts of which bore villar extensions. The middle and distal intestinal mucosa presented simple finger-like mucosal folds in all age groups. The intestinal epithelium in all groups comprised of simple absorptive columnar cells with brush border, intraepithelial leukocytes and goblet cells. The tunica muscularis contained a myenteric plexus in all groups. Carbohydrate histochemistry in all ages under study revealed positive reaction to PAS in the oesophageal mucous cells, stomach simple columnar epithelium and intestinal goblet cells. At pH 2.5, the oesophageal mucous cells and intestinal goblet cells were positive to AB reaction but the stomach epithelium was AB negative in all groups. On subjecting the mucin containing entities to combined AB and PAS reaction after diastase pre-treatment, the oesophageal and oro- pharyngeal wall mucosa presented mixed acid and neutral mucins in all the age groups. The stomach presented only neutral mucins while the intestine presented mixed mucin with acid mucin dominating in the adult proximal intestine.
The presence of stratified mucous epithelium observed in the oro-pharyngeal wall and oesophagus is for protection of the tract from abrasion from rough feed. The mucin in the oesophagus is also associated with pregastric digestion of food since the teleost digestive tract lacks salivary glands. The eosinophilic club cell is for non-specific immunity. The taste buds seen in the adult group is for selection and rejection of food materials by gustation. The oesogaster seen in the adult group suggests a structure involved in increasing surface area for gastric digestion and production of extra mucin to reduce the effect of acidic gastric content. The glands in the stomach lamina propria contain oxyntopeptic cells that produce both hydrochloric acid and pepsinogen. The absence of gastric glands in the pyloric region may be an adaptation to reduce the quantity of gastric acid that enters the proximal intestine that needs an alkaline medium for maximal activity of pancreatic enzymes. The reticulated labyrinthine mucosal folds in the proximal intestine increases surface area for feed digestion and absorption. The increasing number of goblet cells towards the rectum is for increased mucin production to reduce abrasion from fecal materials. The acid mucin seen is associated with protection against mechanical injury from food fibres and pathogenic agents while the neutral mucin is involved in pre-gastric digestion in the oesophagus, buffering the effect of gastric acid in the stomach and transport of small molecules in the intestine.
CHAPTER ONE
1.0. INTRODUCTION
1.1. FISH: SOURCE OF FOOD FOR MAN
Food is one of the basic needs of man (Morey, 1940; Pierce, 2010). Food is produced through agriculture –which is the cultivation of plants and rearing of animals for man’s consumption. Since agriculture produces the food that provides the calories and micronutrients essential for a healthy and productive life, it is interlinked in many important ways to nutrition and health (Michael, 2011).These nutrients include carbohydrates, proteins, fats and oil, minerals, vitamins and water. Of these nutrients, it is the proteins that supply the body with amino acids necessary for growth and repair of damaged tissues. The sources of protein include plants and animals although the animal sources are preferred because of the presence of essential amino acids and higher digestibility. But the major disadvantage is higher cost. The animal sources include fish, poultry, dairy, pork, snail, and rabbit. Fishing, like other hunting activities has been a major source of food for the human race and has put an end to the unsavory outbreak of anaemia and kwashiorkor in developing countries. It accounts for one fifth of world total supply of animal protein (FAO, 1991; Olagunju et al., 2007).
In Nigeria, fisheries occupy a unique position in the agricultural sector of the economy (Kudi et al., 2008). Its contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose from 76.76 billion in
2001 to N162.61 billion in 2005 (CBN Report, 2005). Fish is an important source of protein to a large number of Nigerians. It provides 40% of the dietary intake of animal protein of the average Nigerian (FDF, 1997; Sogbesan et al., 2006). According to Adekoya and Miller (2004), fish and fish products constitute more than 60% of the total protein intake in adults especially in rural areas. Amiengheme (2005) enumerated the importance of fish in Human Nutrition as follows:
• Fish food has a nutrient profile superior to all terrestrial meats (beef, pork and chicken) being an excellent source of high quality animal protein and highly digestible energy;
• Fish is a good source of sulphur and essential amino acids such as lysine, leucine, valine and arginine. It is therefore suitable for supplementing diets of high carbohydrate contents;
• Fish is also a good source of thiamine as well as an extremely rich source of (Omega–
3) polysaturated fatty acids, fat soluble vitamins (A,D and E), water soluble vitamins
(B complex) and minerals (calcium, phosphorus, iron, iodine and selenium);
• It has a high content of polysaturated (Omega III) fatty acids, which are important in lowering blood cholesterol level and high blood pressure. It reduces the risk of sudden death from heart attacks and reduces rheumatoid arthritis. It also lowers the risk of age- related muscular degeneration and vision impairment; decreases the risk of bowel cancer and reduces insulin resistance in skeletal muscles.
Nigerians are large consumers of fish, with an annual average demand estimate at 1.4 million metric tonnes, (Kudi et al., 2008). However a demand and supply gap of at least 0.7 million metric tonnes exists nationally with import making up the short fall at a cost of 400 billion United States dollars per year. Domestic fish production of about 0.5 million metric tonnes is supplied by artisan fishermen (85%), and fish farmers (15%) (Adekoya and Miller, 2004; Emokaro, 2010; Businessday, 2011). According to FAO (2007), this figure (0.7 million metric tonnes) makes Nigeria the largest importer of fish in the developing world.
To take advantage of the large market created by this deficit, some Nigerians are increasing their participation in aquaculture, with many fish farmers focusing on African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, as they have been shown to have a potential market value of two to three times that of other cultivable species like Tilapia and Heterobranchus (FAO, 2000; Fafioye and Oluajo, 2005; Emokaro et al., 2010; Businessday, 2011). Fish farming generates employment directly and indirectly for people involved in the value addition of processing (Olagunju et al., 2007). Aquaculture is also a ready alternative to fish supply because of great concern on fish depletion in the oceans due to over fishing; fish deaths caused by oil spillage and heavy metal pollution; natural disasters like Tsunami, flooding and excessive drought due to climate change (Dublin-Green et al., 1998; UNEP, 2004; Damassa, 2006; Gabriel et al., 2007; Tawari-Fufeyin et al., 2008). A survey by Addo (2005), revealed that Nigerian children below the age of 18 years, who make up about 47% of our total population are still victims of stunting, wasting and under-weight, so with the increased establishment of more aquaculture in Nigeria, it is possible to reverse this trend of malnourishment among Nigerians below the age of eighteen years.
1.4.Statement of problem
Despite the increasing interest and population of catfish aquaculture in Nigeria, there is paucity of knowledge on the basic biology of the digestive tract of farmed African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell, 1822). The knowledge obtained from this study will be useful in diagnosis of fish pathology, in nutritional diseases and in fish toxicology. It will also provide baseline information for further investigative researches to improve growth rate, fish fillet quality and quantity and also better feeding management practices in fish farms.
1.5.Main research objective
To study the morphology and histochemical characteristics of the digestive tract of the
African catfish at different ages post-hatch, from commercial and intensively farmed fish.
Specific objectives
• To describe the gross anatomy and morphometry of the digestive tract.
• To describe the histological features of organs of the tract
• To characterize the histochemistry of the mucous-producing cells of the tract.
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
MORPHOLOGY OF THE DIGESTIVE TRACT OFTHE AFRICAN CATFISH (CLARIAS GARIEPINUS BURCHELL 1822)>
PROJECTOPICS.com Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project
Chat Us on WhatsApp » 07035244445
DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:
07035244445 (Country Code: +234)YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]